<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin - Good Choice?</title>
	<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 04:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/#comment-2783</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>Oh I see, the article had your quote.  I wondered why you were providing an article listing her favorables off from the top.  Admittedly Alaska as battleground == not so good.  When I first heard about Palin I figured he'd pick someone with more pieces on the Risk board like the Huckster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I see, the article had your quote.  I wondered why you were providing an article listing her favorables off from the top.  Admittedly Alaska as battleground == not so good.  When I first heard about Palin I figured he&#8217;d pick someone with more pieces on the Risk board like the Huckster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cephyn</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/#comment-2782</link>
		<author>cephyn</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>I'm immune to poison. 

&lt;a href=http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837510,00.html rel="nofollow"&gt;Quote mid-article&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m immune to poison. </p>
<p><a href=http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837510,00.html rel="nofollow">Quote mid-article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/#comment-2781</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/29/palin-good-choice/#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>Let's see, you're saying that McCain jettisoned his favorite talking point, so that means he can't use it anymore, but Palin won a beauty contest, so therefore this is like the scene in The Princess Bride.  Therefore, it must have been Barack Obama, because you would want us to think that it was Sarah Palin as a matter of reverse psychology, because you wouldn't post this unless it was a talking point for the ticket you're going to vote for, which means that if Sarah Palin DIDN'T say that you would want us to think that she did so that the two inexperienced running mates on both tickets cancel each other out in a different way?

(gets ready to turn around to look behind him at ballot box)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, you&#8217;re saying that McCain jettisoned his favorite talking point, so that means he can&#8217;t use it anymore, but Palin won a beauty contest, so therefore this is like the scene in The Princess Bride.  Therefore, it must have been Barack Obama, because you would want us to think that it was Sarah Palin as a matter of reverse psychology, because you wouldn&#8217;t post this unless it was a talking point for the ticket you&#8217;re going to vote for, which means that if Sarah Palin DIDN&#8217;T say that you would want us to think that she did so that the two inexperienced running mates on both tickets cancel each other out in a different way?</p>
<p>(gets ready to turn around to look behind him at ballot box)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

